Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Deep Pencil - the musings of Morgan Bell

 
If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it did it really make a sound? If i post a blog and nobody reads it was there really any point? You have entered the random thinking space of Morgan Bell . . . These are my musings . . . things about my life written off the top of my head . . . written in an informal disjointed style almost completely devoid of punctuation, this is where i flesh out writing ideas, discuss my life, and generally be self indulgent . . . it is also the bargain bin for articles which do not fit in with the film or arts themes of my other blogs . . . so have a wander around my mind, have a laugh, have a think, be nice, and humour me!

Her voice is like Treacle . . .

November 9th 2008 08:19
If you are a woman who has ever worked on the phones (call-centre, telemarketing, reception etc) you will know that the more you raise the pitch of your voice, the more politely people will treat you. A high-pitched voice conjures an imagine of youth, naivety, and sweetness. You may even find that when you first meet strangers face-to-face, or if you are asking a question, or requesting a favour, you temporarily develop a helium squeak.

Doris Roberts (who has a naturally deep voice) once said that for her character of Marie Barone on Everybody Loves Raymond:

"I talk way up hee-uh. Because if I used my own voice for Marie, you wouldn't laugh at her. You'd find her quite unpleasant."

"As I speak and you hear my voice, it's a very deep voice, that's not Marie Barone. Marie Barone says, [higher-pitched voice] "Are you hungry, dear?" It's a whole other person. It doesn't have the strength and fortitude of Doris Roberts. It has another attitude, another concept, and I've done that because I think if I used Doris' voice, you'd be afraid. She's too formidable at saying the things that she says. But as Marie, I'm not a scatterbrain, but she's--it's naivety--she has no idea that she's intrusive; she has no idea that she's a control freak."

Woody Allen asked Mira Sorvino to create a voice for her character in his film Mighty Aphrodite but did not tell her how. She just had to sound stupid. So Mira chose the high-pitched dumb sounding voice that became so important for the movie's success. She did not want Linda to be too sexy and too successful as a sex worker, but innocent, natural and stupid - in contrast to her own preconception of the porn world as dark and sleazy.

Mira Sorvino's role as the naive porn-star Linda Ash/Judy Cum earned her a Golden Globe and an Oscar as Best Supporting Actress in 1995.




Women speak in a higher tone of voice when at their most fertile, making them more attractive to the opposite sex, scientists have found. Recordings made when fertility was low and again nearer ovulation showed that women's voices took on more feminine qualities as they neared their optimum time for conceiving.

During testing women spoke in a higher pitch when nearer to the time when an egg is released. The difference in pitch was the greatest on the two highest fertility days just before ovulation. The study shows women change their voice in relation to fertility - and possibly only in social communication contexts.

A study of the Hadza people of Tanzania by academics from McMaster University's department of psychology, neuroscience and behaviour showed that men were more attracted to women with higher voices. A higher pitch was associated with subordination, femininity, health and youthfulness. By contrast, women preferred men with deeper voices.

Beehive by Stuntkid





97
Vote
Shared on
   


Weird Kiss

November 4th 2008 16:53
Forget Britney and Madonna . . . what about Jeffrey Star and Chris Crocker?

Yes the MySpace celebrity (Star) and the YouTube celebrity (Crocker - think "leave Britney alone") are together at last!

I dont know what prompted them to join forces . . . perhaps they felt like they werent getting enough attention separately? haha



Looks a bit weird hey? Its kind of like two straight women kissing - they seem like they should be competitors, not comrades!

I actually really like Jeffrey Star's music, its a bit electroclash and a bit industrial pop, and he is an amazing makeup artist.

Heres a few snaps from his MySpace:

Jeffrey Star


Jeffrey Star


Jeffrey Star





And heres a couple of snaps of the stunningly beautiful Ms Crocker - i think he looks like the love child of Kurt Cobain and Avril Lavigne

Chris Crocker


Chris Crocker


72
Vote
Shared on
   


Remembering Matthew Shepard

October 25th 2008 13:52
Ten years have passed since Matthew Shepard was murdered in a vicious anti-gay hate crime.

Matthew Shepard died October 12, 1998.

Matthew Shepard



His mother Judy continues to campaign against hatred of gays and lesbians.


The level of ignorance is astounding. The continuing belief that what happened to Matt was not a hate crime and the notion that ‘special people shouldn’t have special rights’, is beyond my comprehension. The level of ‘hate’ is frightening.

Judy Shepard



Judy Shepard lost her son, Matthew Shepard, in a murder motivated by anti-gay hate. That tragedy became a symbol of the need to pass national hate crimes legislation. Mrs. Shepard is an international spokeswoman, activist and executive director of the Matthew Shepard Foundation. She is focused on a vision to replace hate with compassion, acceptance and understanding.






Shortly after midnight on October 7, 1998, 21-year-old Matthew Shepard met Aaron James McKinney and Russell Arthur Henderson in a bar. McKinney and Henderson posed as gay men and offered Shepard a ride in their car. Subsequently, Shepard was robbed, pistol whipped, tortured, tied to a fence in a remote, rural area, and left to die. Still tied to the fence, Shepard was discovered eighteen hours later by a cyclist, who at first thought that Shepard was a scarecrow. At the time of discovery, Shepard was still alive, but in a coma.

Shepard suffered a fracture from the back of his head to the front of his right ear. He had severe brain stem damage, which affected his body's ability to regulate heart rate, body temperature and other vital signs. There were also about a dozen small lacerations around his head, face and neck. His injuries were deemed too severe for doctors to operate. Shepard never regained consciousness and remained on full life support. As he lay in intensive care, candlelight vigils were held by the people of Laramie.

He was pronounced dead at 12:53 A.M. on October 12, 1998 at Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins. Police arrested McKinney and Henderson shortly thereafter, finding the bloody gun as well as the victim's shoes and wallet in their truck.

Henderson pleaded guilty on April 5, 1999, and agreed to testify against McKinney to avoid the death penalty; he received two consecutive life sentences. The jury in McKinney's trial found him guilty of felony murder. As it began to deliberate on the death penalty, Shepard's parents brokered a deal, resulting in McKinney receiving two consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole.

The disturbing and brutal nature of Matthew Shepard's murder prompted calls for new legislation addressing hate crime.



USA Hate Crimes in 2004

9,528 victims of hate crimes.

53.8 percent were victims of racial prejudice.
(Of those, 67.9 percent were anti-black, and 20.1 percent were anti-white.)

16.7 percent were victims of religious intolerance
(Of those, 67.8 percent were anti-Jewish, and 12.7 percent were anti-Islamic.)

15.6 percent (over 1,400) were attacked because of sexual-orientation.
(Of those, 60.9 percent were male victims)

13. 2 percent were targeted due to ethnicity/national orientation.
(Of those, 51.5 percent were anti-Hispanic.)

Less than 1 percent of the total victims of crimes motivated by a single bias were targets of an anti-disability bias. Of the 73 victims of this type, 49 were mentally disabled.

* source: the FBI


154
Vote
Shared on
   


"I don't find anything in the Gospels about abortion or gay marriage."

Sister Mary Ann Cunningham
National Coalition of American Nuns


"We encourage respect for the moral adulthood of women and will choose legislators who will recognize the right of women to make reproductive decisions and receive medical treatment according to the rights of privacy and conscience."

Open letter to Catholic voters – Oct 22, 2006
National Coalition of American Nuns


The National Coalition of American Nuns was founded in 1969 by Sister Margaret Traxler and currently represents 1,200 Catholic Nuns.

Sister Jeannine Gramick has held a number of leadership positions in the National Coalition of American Nuns. She is an open advocate of reproductive rights and a woman's right to choose. In 1984 she became a signatory to the first "Catholics for a Free Choice" ad in the New York Times.

In her book A Challenge to Love (1980) Sister Gramick concludes that homosexual prejudice can be replaced "with toleration and finally with acceptance, through education and 'conscious-raising' efforts directed at the shattering of gay and lesbian 'myths and stereotypes,' the removal of discriminatory legal barriers and the end to any 'taboo behavior' society assigns as 'unnatural.'

In November 2006, Sr. Jeannine Gramick was named a recipient of the Mother Teresa Award from the St. Bernadette Institute of Sacred Art in Albuquerque, NM. Nominations come from the public to recognise people who “beautify the world”. Sister Gramick was chosen by the Institute "for her role as American Human Rights Activist, especially in the field of Spirituality"

Other books by Sister Jeannine Gramick include
A time to speak; a collection of contemporary statements from U. S. Catholic sources on homosexuality (1978)
Homosexuality and the Catholic Church (1985)
The Vatican and Homosexuality (1988)
Homosexuality in the Priesthood and Religious Life (1989)
Building Bridges: Gay and Lesbian Reality and the Catholic Church (1992)
Voices of Hope: A Collection of Positive Catholic Writings on Lesbian/Gay Issues (1995).


Sister Jeannine Gramick founded the gay-friendly pro-choice New Ways Ministry with Father Robert Nugent.





83% of U.S. Catholics believe that it is morally wrong to discriminate against homosexuals (November 2001 Contemporary Catholic Trends Survey)

61% of U.S. Catholics believe that women should be priests (September 2005 National Catholic Reporter Survey)

49% of U.S. Catholics do not believe all abortions should be illegal (Oct 2006 National Catholic Reporter Survey)

31% of American Catholics agree that using artificial birth control is a sin (Mar 2008 Contemporary Catholic Trends Survey)

62% of U.S. Catholics believe the Roman Catholic Church is out of touch with the views of Catholics in America today (Apr 2008 The Washington Post - ABC News Poll)








The Catholic Call To Action

In October 1976, the U.S. Bishops held the first Call To Action conference in Cobo Hall, Detroit. At this conference, 1,351 lay, religious and clergy delegates, appointed by their local bishops, voted for an inclusive church, open to women and married priests, with shared decision-making and greater social justice. That Call To Action was the culmination of a two-year national consultation involving over 800,000 Catholics in 125 dioceses.

Today, the 25,000 lay, religious, clergy and bishop members of Call To Action continue our work for justice in the spirit of the first CTA conference.






Catholics For Choice

Catholics for Choice (CFC) was founded in 1973 to serve as a voice for Catholics who believe that the Catholic tradition supports a woman’s moral and legal right to follow her conscience in matters of sexuality and reproductive health.

CFC believes in and works toward the following principles:

The right of individuals and couples to decide on when, whether and how they will form families;

Women's and men's moral agency in reproductive health decisions, supported by access to the full range of contraceptive choices, safe and legal abortion, pre- and post-natal care and family supports;

Support and respect, including treatment, prevention, and especially access to condoms, for people living with HIV/AIDS and those at risk;

Social and economic justice that ensures that no one is denied sexual or reproductive health services because they cannot afford them;

Equality for and non-discrimination against women in government, civil society, and all faith groups;

Scientific and public policies that are determined by evidence-based research, democratic structures, and the common good;

The right of faith groups to participate in public policy formation and the responsibility of policy makers to legislate without privileging sectarian religious beliefs;

Freedom from all forms of intimate violence, including sexual abuse in the family, relationships, and the church;

Respect for and recognition of gay, lesbian, bi and transgendered persons and relationships with all legal rights;



excerpts from the Catholics For Choice website
*note: "the law" refers to Catholic canonical law

What does the law have to say specifically about punishments for being a pro-choice Catholic?

The law says nothing on this subject.

Regardless, some people are afraid that they will be punished if their pro-choice beliefs are publicly known.

It sometimes feels like any pro-choice Catholic is destined for excommunication, mainly due to some bishops’ actions and the vocal campaigns of anti–choice Catholics who call for the ex-communication of pro-choice national and state legislators.

Although getting an abortion is against the church’s law, the law itself is quite different from what many think it is.

The law considers a host of mitigating factors before meting out punishment. These are familiar concepts we use in our secular legal systems. People who should receive a lesser penalty include those who act in the heat of passion, those under the influence of drugs or alcohol, those who act with immoderate force in self-defense, and even in the most serious cases, those forced through fear or necessity or serious inconvenience.

People not subject to canonical penalties and ex-communication include:
- people under the age of seventeen
- those who were unaware that they were violating a law
- those who acted in self-defense with due moderation

Changes over the years to theology and law underscore the responsibility of Catholics to form their consciences through inquiry and study, not just by simple reliance on one priest or bishop’s teaching or the memorization of a current catechism or through simplistic and generalized interpretations of canon law. The law should be used to teach and inform, not to exclude.






Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
120
Vote
Shared on
   


Carl Sagan - the Science of Life

October 19th 2008 10:11
selected excerpts from
“Abortion: Is it Possible to be both “Pro-life” and “Pro-Choice”?”
by Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan
Chapter 15
Billions and Billions :
Thoughts on Life and Death
at the Brink of the Millennium

1997
ISBN 0-345-37918-7
Really Long Link

Sagan's final work tackles a variety of issues from global warming to the population explosion. The book is broken down into three sections--each with a fair share of gems. The first section focuses on numbers, providing many thought-provoking perspectives on things people don't tend to think about but probably should. The second section deals mostly with environmental problems. The final portion of the book discusses a variety of topics including abortion, nuclear weapons, and Carl's final years battling his illness.

Chapter 15 on abortion is a must-read for everyone--regardless of whether you are pro-life or pro-choice. Essentially, the chapter contains a scientific look at the issue and asks all the tough questions from both sides. You aren't likely to hear all of this in any one place and certainly not from only one of the pro or con camps.

Carl Sagan wrote the following:

Once we acknowledge that the state can interfere at any time in the pregnancy, doesn't it follow that the state can interfere at all times?

This conjures up the specter of predominantly male, predominantly affluent legislators telling poor women they must bear and raise alone children they cannot afford to bring up; forcing teenagers to bear children they are not emotionally prepared to deal with; saying to women who wish for a career that they must give up their dreams, stay home, and bring up babies; and, worst of all, condemning victims of rape and incest to carry and nurture the offspring of their assailants. Legislative prohibitions on abortion arouse the suspicion that their real intent is to control the independence and sexuality of women…

That protection, that right to life, eludes the 40,000 children under five who die on our planet each day from preventable starvation, dehydration, disease, and neglect.

Every human sperm and egg is, beyond the shadow of a doubt, alive. They are not human beings, of course. However, it could be argued that neither is a fertilized egg.



The Old and New Testaments--rich in astonishingly detailed prohibitions on dress, diet, and permissible words--contain not a word specifically prohibiting abortion. The only passage that's remotely relevant (Exodus 21:22) decrees that if there's a fight and a woman bystander should accidentally be injured and made to miscarry, the assailant must pay a fine.

But when sperm cells were examined in the seventeenth century by the first microscopes, they were thought to show a fully formed human being. An old idea of the homunculus was resuscitated--in which within each sperm cell was a fully formed tiny human, within whose testes were innumerable other homunculi, etc., ad infinitum. In part through this misinterpretation of scientific data, in 1869 abortion at any time for any reason became grounds for excommunication. It is surprising to most Catholics and others to discover that the date was not much earlier.

From colonial times to the nineteenth century, the choice in the United States was the woman's until "quickening." An abortion in the first or even second trimester was at worst a misdemeanor. Convictions were rarely sought and almost impossible to obtain, because they depended entirely on the woman's own testimony of whether she had felt quickening, and because of the jury's distaste for prosecuting a woman for exercising her right to choose. In 1800 there was not, so far as is known, a single statute in the United States concerning abortion. Advertisements for drugs to induce abortion could be found in virtually every newspaper and even in many church publications--although the language used was suitably euphemistic, if widely understood.

But by 1900, abortion had been banned at any time in pregnancy by every state in the Union, except when necessary to save the woman's life. What happened to bring about so striking a reversal? Religion had little to do with it. Drastic economic and social conversions were turning this country from an agrarian to an urban-industrial society. America was in the process of changing from having one of the highest birthrates in the world to one of the lowest. Abortion certainly played a role and stimulated forces to suppress it.

Every one of us began from a dot. A fertilized egg is roughly the size of the period at the end of this sentence. The momentous meeting of sperm and egg generally occurs in one of the two fallopian tubes. One cell becomes two, two become four, and so on—an exponentiation of base-2 arithmetic. By the tenth day the fertilized egg has become a kind of hollow sphere wandering off to another realm: the womb. It destroys tissue in its path. It sucks blood from capillaries. It bathes itself in maternal blood, from which it extracts oxygen and nutrients. It establishes itself as a kind of parasite on the walls of the uterus.



The criterion adopted was whether the fetus could live outside the mother. This is called "viability" and depends in part on the ability to breathe. The lungs are simply not developed, and the fetus cannot breathe--no matter how advanced an artificial lung it might be placed in—until about the 24th week, near the start of the sixth month. This is why Roe v. Wade permits the states to prohibit abortions in the last trimester. It's a very pragmatic criterion.

Thinking occurs, of course, in the brain--principally in the top layers of the convoluted "gray matter" called the cerebral cortex. The roughly 100 billion neurons in the brain constitute the material basis of thought. The neurons are connected to each other, and their linkups play a major role in what we experience as thinking. But large-scale linking up of neurons doesn't begin until the 24th to 27th week of pregnancy--the sixth month.

Since, on average, fetal thinking occurs even later than fetal lung development, we find Roe v. Wade to be a good and prudent decision addressing a complex and difficult issue. With prohibitions on abortion in the last trimester--except in cases of grave medical necessity--it strikes a fair balance between the conflicting claims of freedom and life.

* these are selected excerpts - to see full text follow link at top of page



66
Vote
Shared on
   


Sergius and Bacchus were soldiers in the Roman army. They were secret Christians. But they were open lovers.

Sergius and Bacchus were third century Roman soldiers who are commemorated as martyrs by the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches. They were severely punished in 303, with Bacchus dying during torture, and Sergius eventually beheaded


[ Click here to read more ]
120
Vote
Shared on
   


Problems Asexuals Face

September 15th 2008 16:56
The problems that Asexuals face mostly arise from other people not understanding or not accepting what Asexuality is. In our sex-crazed society we place a high premium on sexuality and sexual conquests, so where does a person with no sexual desires or motivations fit in?


[ Click here to read more ]
101
Vote
Shared on
   


famous Asexual people

July 13th 2008 10:46
alleged Asexual celebrities and historical figures:

Cliff Richard (born 1940) singer


[ Click here to read more ]
240
Vote
Shared on
   


A forum for World Youth Day pilgrims, their family and friends, and all who wish to explore the role of gays and lesbians in the Catholic Church.

Speakers include a parent couple actively involved in their parish who have two gay sons, a youth worker from NSW’s leading gay and lesbian youth service, a young gay Catholic sharing his journey and a Catholic priest who has ministered to gay and lesbian Catholics, both in Australia and overseas


[ Click here to read more ]
128
Vote
Shared on
   


have you heard of the Pink Pistols in the USA?

apparently the queer community in america is actively arming itself due to fear of gay bashings, rapes and hate killings . . . you know somethings not right when the gays are picking up guns . . . i can only imagine how scared these people must feel to form a gun club as the most effective way of warding off homophobic violence


[ Click here to read more ]
173
Vote
Shared on
   


what is Asexuality? (LINK)

March 28th 2008 06:37
An “asexual” person is someone who has no desire to have sex.

Asexuality is not a choice like celibacy


[ Click here to read more ]
108
Vote
   


Morgan Bell's Blogs

5006 Vote(s)
466 Comment(s)
50 Post(s)
3595 Vote(s)
66 Comment(s)
57 Post(s)
7522 Vote(s)
576 Comment(s)
76 Post(s)
Moderated by Morgan Bell
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]