Deep Pencil - the musings of Morgan Bell

David in fact was speaking against Brazilian waxing BECAUSE it makes women look like little girls. His exact sentiment was that he prefers natural looking women and he was criticizing men who prefer the shaved look, precisely because it appeals to their pedophillic nature.

I remember reading recently about a young girl in Saudi Arabia who was married to a man at age 8. Her father had given her to the man as payment for a debt.

You know what really amazes me about women who get waxed?

They don't realise they're promoting paedophilia.

Oh they'll all say it's all in the name of hygeine. But what real mother who has ever powdered her daughter would ever consent to looking like a baby in front of a man?

I know this is a bit of a sick comment, but if a woman is waxed or lasered, I can't even get a hardon. I keep thinking about how evil paedophiles are.

Did you see David over on Whitney's blog, talking about having sex with women who have had Brazilian waxes because it makes them more like children... he actually said he prefers nt!!!!!!!!

I know for some of you, reading words, and making up the message to suit is part in parcel with your daily life, however, don't crucify me for saying the truth.

Did you see David over on Whitney's blog, talking about having sex with women who have had Brazilian waxes because it makes them more like children... he actually said he prefers nt!!!!!!!!

I am all about fairness and so I just want to set the record straight that David in fact was speaking against Brazilian waxing BECAUSE it makes women look like little girls. His exact sentiment was that he prefers natural looking women and he was criticizing men who prefer the shaved look, precisely because it appeals to their pedophillic nature.

You're a fraud, baby. A total fraud. You're the mouthpiece of all women who cry out, It's a man's world. Let's bring it down. Let's have a national close legs day. Well guess what little Miss Atheist. There are women on Orble who love their husbands and love their children and have lives. Not every woman on Orble is going to agree with you. They'll see you as the narcissistic bitch you are. THey'll just sit back and go. How self-centred is this woman. She won't have kids. She won't meet a man.

They don't realise they're promoting paedophilia.

Otherwise he'd have stated that they *were* promoting pedophilia.

They don't realise they ARE promoting paedophilia.

His IP's been banned, from what I hear

as for the banning, David got himself banned by breaching Terms & Conditions, he has been banned from four different accounts now, it is a result of his own behaviour yet noone seems to acknowledge this.

I do appreciate your opinions on the matter but i just cant agree with them, i think you have a very romanticised idea of what David used to be like

D. Armenta ...

It's actually rude over here not to give me a blow job before speaking to me ... and you're allowed to grip me by the shoulders while you're doing it ... It's an old Aussie custom that dates back to antiquity ... relating to not speaking with your mouth full ...

David ...

Oh, sorry David! I thought I had done before..nope, was flossing my teeth. Honest mistake.

This is a blogging site for Chrissakes! I want to be confronted, offended and amused as well as informed and entertained. I am so sick of politically correct bullsh*t...and the fact that I asterisked that word says it all.

Everyone is free to move on if they don't like a blogger or a post. I agree that there should be no personal attacks against anyone but it sounds like David was someone we need more of here.

How's your virtual relationship going with Normie Smormie? Poor Norm. He used to be a good bloke. But Morgie Smorgie got into his head like Hannibal Lecter got into Dr Chilton's head. And stuffed it up completely. Now poor old Norm doesn't know if he should comment on my posts or not, out of fear of offending a woman he dreams of being with who is asexual. Norm. Get a grip man. Wake up to yourself man. This woman is poison.

And Jon is such a dickhead, he agrees with her. I've never met Jon. I don't want to. He's a pathetic bastard who doesn't even deserve the term male.

Jon is as cuntsruck as Norm. I mean I like a good fuck as much as the next man. But please can it be a real fuck? At least Teresa puts out. And Teresa is a great fuck. She loves sex. She doesn't sit on Orble all day going I'm asexual Normie Smormie. She puts out. I often think that's the thing that tipped Morgan over the edge. All this talk abou asexuality, when all she needs in life is a good fuck.

My speculation is she's been totally damaged by something that occurred in her life and just can't get to the point of admitting it or discussing it, so she's put her real self under the carpet and created this false identity for herself. She wants a good fuck as much as the next woman. If Ed had a dick, she'd let him fuck her.

Jon can you just go and slip Morgan a length? If you have a dick that is.

Norm get your head out of your arse man, and chase a decent woman who puts out.

Do you intend to meet Morgan or is this all a virtual fantasy to you? Do you wank off over her? What a waste of sperm. Do you intend to sit on the net for the next three years flirting with Morgan and whacking off over her? Cos that's the impression I'm getting.

Run for the hills man. Before you become a pansy who likes footy. Hang around the gay community Pat? You'll eventually butt fuck Ed out of sympathy for Morgan or in some futile attempt to impress her.

What would an asexual know about sexual advances anyway. Doesn't she reject them all to feel oh-so special?

As to Norm. He can wank off all he likes over his virtual affair with you. I've met Norm. I knew he wasn't into reality. You're just his rebound cos Brooke Wolfgobbler left him due to his unreality.

But since she's a leg-closer and prick-teaser and control-freak from wayback, it doesn't matter what her pubes look like to me.

But maybe you should also ask yourself why he attacks you so viciously,

And I don't think it's a particularly nice thing to do to cut and paste old comments in order to prove a point.

he went from being offensive in a witty and humorous way to completely losing the plot and spitting venom totally unrelated to any post he was commenting on and making it generally unpleasant for the blog owners and their readers.

it went from that to a vendetta which spilled over to many other people's blogs. It was unfortunate because because he used to have a sense of humour about it all but that was lost. It ended up being a series of long-winded incredibly cruel and nasty rants.

Funny, for a 'straight' male, David sure likes to check me out in the locker room. I don't know that Mr Four-Inches of Pleasure should really be criticising others about their shlong size. Didn't David's wife divorce him? Gosh - who's got the tiny knob now eh?

That's David's problem - he's a fucking ALCOHOLIC JUNKIE!! Hepatitis anyone?

David, this comment is NOT directed at you, therefore there is NO need to respond... I suggest you go and belt one out with Damo if you're feeling tense honey.

hi Alt_Ed,
belt one out? HAHAHahaha
no one can replicate you honey, they broke the mould with your sense of humour . .

look i treat people how they treat me and David treats me like shit,

m not going to censor myself when he certainly doesnt

But maybe you should also ask yourself why he attacks you so viciously

I watched the whole thing happen. It was a bit of tragic theater and I admittedly was somewhat fascinated with the manner in which things unraveled.

I have felt betrayed by women who constantly look down on me for the choices I have made in order to stay home with my children

But from woman to woman, I think it is critical not to tell a woman she is asking for it when her sexuality is used against her...in any manner.

Teresa has a great fanny with pubic hair. She's natural and real.

David is very angry with me for never responding to his baiting, and he is very angry with himself for being attracted to me, he is incensed by the fact that i am Asexual and that i could not be lured by his "charm

hi Lilla,


I think Orble admin is foolish to let it go on and on wihtout givin Morgan her Block orbler Button because sadly, I can see that she will not cease the tantrums until she gets her way.

i dont really think one post on the Writers Forum over six months ago could really be defined as a series of tantrums

and i have seen you request a block button yourself so i dont know why you are trying to insinuate i would be the sole beneficiary of such a measure . . . another person who has requested the function is Cheryl

I have, by far, been the most vocal and pushed the hardest for a 'block user' or 'report abuse' button as I'm sure Jon would attest to if he ever actually responded to anything. I have put in more complaints than I can count regarding posts and comments where I feel anyone is being mistreated.

I read the comment made before it was withdrawn regarding Morgan's 'tantrums' on the subject. I thought that was tasteless and uncalled for. Morgan happened to write a post (which I was in the midst of writing myself at the time but she beat to the punch) regarding rules on Orble. I don't think the post in question was in any way a tantrum as many of the respondents agreed it was a good idea.

Do I like Morgan? Yes. Do I agree with everything she writes? No. Do I think she has been subjected to cyberbullying? Yes. Before you jump on your high horses and say she is guilty of the same, for the last few weeks almost every blog I have clicked on and read that she had made a comment on, David had followed her and subjected her to a barrage of personal abuse that had nothing to do with the subject at hand. I don't think that anyone deserves that.

Alt-ed was just as bad, doing the same to other people. It is not right, nor is it adult behaviour. It has been said that adults should be able to self-monitor, well in a perfect that would be the case. This is obviously far from a perfect world.

I have watched a site that I used to enjoy participating in degenerate into something, that if I were a casual surfer who happened upon the site, would avoid like the plague.

I have never wanted to enter into any form of personal warfare on this site. I have no problem with people voicing differing opinions. This is something altogether different.

I have been weighing up in the last couple of weeks whether to continue participating at all on Orble and this has just made up my mind for me. Nothing will change.

I'm sure 99% of you couldn't give a damn if I blog here or not and that is fine. I enjoyed my small readership and engaging with others but I don't enjoy it anymore. I will be blogging on a site which takes abuse seriously and has measures already in place to deal with it. Yes it has 'report abuse' buttons which was one of the first questions I asked when I joined. They seemed quite bewildered that I had asked as it is the norm everywhere else.

Janet, it has always been a pleasure to read your posts.

Hi Jon,

I would just like to offer my support for Moragns suggestion of :

1) a "report abuse" button on all posts

2) a "block user" button to prevent unwanted contact from trolls and bullies etc who have Orble accounts

I have never complained before, although I probably could as I am not a stranger to having a couple of hecklers visit me regularly. They are purile and childish and offer nothing constructive in their comments, sometimes not even related to the post. They dont even have an opinion that could make me say it is a clash of opinions ... it is pure personal attack from the outset because of my post just being there and what it is : me being who I am?

There is nothing to be gained through trying a rational conversation or debate as one does with normal mature adults with such people.

Their only mission it seems is to ruin my day with their vitriolic bile. Now whilst I can avoid visiting them, I cannot avoid them upsetting me, because the words are read before the delete can be clicked on.

I would therefore strongly advocate that a *BLOCK USER* button be added to the list. Please. This would certainly make my blogging experience more enjoyable.

I do believe that nothing would get the message home quicker to such people, and sort this whole problem than the instigation of these two buttons. It would serve orble well for these people to find that they are unwelcome and can no longer roam around like emotional hitmen and women, heckling normal rational people just trying to have some interaction on their ideas and thoughts.

Lilla ...

Hi Jon,
>
> I must speak freely and let you know that I am grossly offended by the photo of an orbler Alt_ed has posted with perveted graphics of phallic symbols added to it : paying out another orbler, David.
>
> I know David can be an arrogant, rude, opinionated rant at times, as can Alt_ed, but allowing this persecution against one orbler by another, when you have previously deleted David's less offensive posts, wreaks of injustice. Not to mention David*s rights here with a lawsuit of plagerism and defemation of character, not that I care if he sues Ed or not, its just that it could set a precendence that damages orble in the end, no one else.
>
> You must realise that neither of these two are reasonable souls where homosexduality is concerned?
>
> Its not really even that, its just that I doubt you would let others post such pictures of a heterosexual nature of fellatio so openly as to make the top 10, and not for an entire day! Indeed I have seen many times when you have deleted just such. Another thing that angers me is that there is no mature content offered here to stop young people from viewing such perverted smut.
>
> I think it is a sad day for orble if this kind of picture and biblical perversion is going to be tolerated. I do not think I will be the only one offended either in the long run and hope you choose to stop both sides with the same law. This will send a clear message to others to take their wars off orble to the privacy of a PM punch up.
>
> How horrible to log on this morning to have that shoved in my face!
>
> Thanks for hearing me out.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Lilla ..

You are a frigid pricktease for not giving me a blow job before speaking to me, not that i would fuck you with my worst mates dick, even though you need a good fuck, you need the Asexuality fucked out of you. You disgust me you vile childless abomination. You are the devil and im going to expose you for the poisonous fraud you really are. *

The Beatles claimed they were more popular than Jesus. Morgan is more popular than God. On here.

that may seem like a melodramatic interpretation, but it seems to be dream of the older users . . . if i were gone suddenly Orble writers would be free to publish poetry and prose and flourish creatively . . . apparently i am preventing all this by taking up on spot on the popular list a couple of days a week

i have no idea why other women find misogyny so charming

i know some people around here like how he wards off new writers because they like the network being insular

the only negative people are the ones who barely use the site anymore and only pop their heads back in when they feel like agitating arguments

I know for some of you, reading words, and making up the message to suit is part in parcel with your daily life, however, don't crucify me for saying the truth.

hi Samaritan,

unfairly treated by who?

I know for some of you, reading words, and making up the message to suit is part in parcel with your daily life, however, don't crucify me for saying the truth.

1. I don't like double standards. It annoys me that there seems to be one set of rules when David is discussing people and another set of rules when David is being discussed.

2. I don't like being told I can't like someone - or that if I defend someone, you'll lose respect for me. What's next? You won't let me play with you at recess either. It bugged me in primary school and it bugs me now.

3. I believe in freedom of speech - and not just the kind of freedom of speech that says you can say whatever you want, as long as it fits our ideas of what it's okay to say.

4. I don't think we need to get rid of all the 'politically incorrect' people in the world. My grandmother's a racist. My dad's a sexist. One of my friends is homophobic.

As for not deleting comments from my blog, Morgan said on this very post that she didn't delete David's comments, but that Jon did. So it's okay for her to leave them, but not okay for me. And you yourself said you thought David's comments should be left. Did I mention I don't like double standards?

And David is all three! Woohoo!!! Trifecta! But don't confuse political correctness with hate speech please.

Can you at least consider the possibility that some people may have an opinion about him that is different to your own?

feminism is about choice, and i respect your choices, you can even choose to have David as your best friend, we wont stop you

but i think even with friends you have to acknowledge their faults, David has no respect for women, other than a very narrow idea of how he thinks a woman should act, speak, and live

And I have stated in the past that David has faults. He can be extremely offensive and insulting. But I'm not going to call him a misogynist just because other people say he is. I haven't read any comments where David said women weren't 'real women' for any of the reasons you mention. I saw his comments about you being self-centred because you won't have a man and won't have kids. But that was obviously designed to insult you. And when people are deliberately insulting other people, the things they say may not be a true reflection of how they really think.

unfairly treated by who?

But then, you and Ruby have expressed disgust at the types of women who would defend someone you consider to be a misogynist.

Hello Morgan--

See what I mean about having a chip? Read your last answer. I haven't attacked you, nor have I insulted you.

This:
that may seem like a melodramatic interpretation, but it seems to be dream of the older users . . . if i were gone suddenly Orble writers would be free to publish poetry and prose and flourish creatively . . . apparently i am preventing all this by taking up on spot on the popular list a couple of days a week

and this:
i have no idea why other women find misogyny so charming

this:
i know some people around here like how he wards off new writers because they like the network being insular

this:
the only negative people are the ones who barely use the site anymore and only pop their heads back in when they feel like agitating arguments

this:
I know for some of you, reading words, and making up the message to suit is part in parcel with your daily life, however, don't crucify me for saying the truth.

..all of these comments of yours come off sounding like a bratty prepubescent having a ..well, a tantrum.

1. The man assumes that it is his "God-given right" to control how his wife lives and behaves. Her needs, thoughts, feelings are not considered.

2. He uses God, the Bible, and church teachings to support his right to "tell her what to do," and demands that she "submit" to his desires, whims, decisions, or plans without question. There is no sense of mutuality or loving consideration. It's always his way, or no way.

3. He believes that a woman's beliefs, opinions, views, feelings, and thoughts are of no real value. He may discredit her opinions in general or specifically because she is a "daughter of Eve and easily deceived." Therefore, her opinions are of little consequence.
...

7. The husband remains blind to any fault or cruelty on his part. When anything goes wrong in the home or in the marital relationship, the problem is always the woman. If she would just be "more submissive" or "be filled with the Spirit" or "obey me like a good Christian wife," everything would be fine. He actually sees himself as virtuous for "putting up" with a woman like her. On the other hand, he can become unreasonably jealous if other people, particularly men, pay too much attention to his wife.
...

Type 1 Misogynist (Mild):

No physical abuse of his partner. He uses indirect criticism; denies that he is abusive, protestations of love when confronted with his disrespectful behavior; extremely subtle, may use flattery to keep woman at his side. Uses logic to control situations. Outargues spouse, totally discounts woman's feelings and thoughts. He rarely loses his temper. He always looks as if he is in control, very reasonable. Out of touch with his own feelings.

Type II Misogynist:

Includes Type I behaviors plus more overt verbal tactics such as teasing, bullying, belittling, namecalling, obvious criticism, unfavorable comparison of partner with other woman. Uses nonverbal tactics such as pouting, the "silent treatment," dirty looks to show displeasure. May demand special attention. May be jealous of wife's attention to children or other relatives. May use temper tantrums to get his own way. Increase in intensity and frequency of behaviors over Type I.