Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Deep Pencil - the musings of Morgan Bell

 
If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it did it really make a sound? If i post a blog and nobody reads it was there really any point? You have entered the random thinking space of Morgan Bell . . . These are my musings . . . things about my life written off the top of my head . . . written in an informal disjointed style almost completely devoid of punctuation, this is where i flesh out writing ideas, discuss my life, and generally be self indulgent . . . it is also the bargain bin for articles which do not fit in with the film or arts themes of my other blogs . . . so have a wander around my mind, have a laugh, have a think, be nice, and humour me!

The Science of the Female Orgasm

May 31st 2009 20:19
Evolutionary Biologists have been studying the science of the female orgasm.

In the news recently we have heard studies claiming that wealthy men are more likely to give women orgasms, and women with higher emotional intelligence have a greater frequency of orgasm, but how much is due to our genes?

female orgasm


According to the first genetic study of the female orgasm, up to 45% of the variation in women’s ability to have them could be down to genes.

Biologically it is unclear why women have orgasms. Researchers speculate that female orgasms are an evolutionary accident. Like male nipples, they persist simply because there is no good reason to get rid of them.

Biologists are unable to answer why so many women should be unable to have orgasms during penetrative sex, but able to have them by masturbation. Brain scanning has shown that women who orgasm switch off mentally and emotionally during the orgasm. There also appears to be anatomical differences between women who experience G-spot orgasms and women who don't.

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is very common, with 43% of women in the US having some sort of problem with their sex lives. There is now a spinal cord implant called the Orgasmatron, which stimulates the user when switched on via a remote control. Who said The Stepford Wives was a story of pure science fiction?

female G-spot
In 2008 an Italian research team confirmed the location of the female G-spot









195
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
63 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Chris Champion

May 31st 2009 20:57
Brain scanning has shown that women who orgasm switch off mentally and emotionally during the orgasm.

Nature is so practical. I wonder what brain scanning would determine about men. Perhaps that they are switched on mentally only when reading the sports pages, and switched on emotionally only when watching live sport.

Comment by Morgan Bell

May 31st 2009 21:02
hi Chris,

i think the likelihood of a woman locating a mans mental or emotional switches is in direct proportion to a man locating a woman's G-spot

if not for scientists with scanners it would remain a myth that any of these things really exist . . .

Comment by Jason King

May 31st 2009 21:41

Comment by Morgan Bell

May 31st 2009 21:44
hi Jason,

oh yes i was just reading about how you are bi-sexual now on facebook haha

when you are batting for both teams it really does help if you know where to aim . . .

Comment by Jason King

May 31st 2009 22:03
Hahahaha - busted!

I think it is getting to the stage where I will take it from where I can get it. LOL

Comment by Morgan Bell

May 31st 2009 22:17
hi Jason,

oh dear, surely its not that bad?

you seem like the perfect house-husband, you cook, you clean, you love animals, you have an income, you have unlimited access to movies . . . and movie stars!

if you ever need a beard or a handbag or an escort or a lesson on female anatomy you can find me in the faghag directory!

Comment by Norm

May 31st 2009 23:23
The Italian researcher stumbled upon the find when he lost his watch.

Comment by Morgan Bell

May 31st 2009 23:29
hi Norm,

Italian researchers are very dedicated to their work

did you know they used to prescribe orgasm for female hysteria and anxiety, some dutiful doctors volunteered to perform fellatio on the frazzled ladies . . . now thats dedication

i think orgasm is also prescribed for period pain and sleeplessness

i have a medical degree

Comment by Norm

May 31st 2009 23:36

Comment by Raoul Duke

June 1st 2009 00:02
Prince wrote a great track called G-Spot, which he gave to his protege Jill Jones for her self-titled 1987 album. Great track too ... "G-spot, g-spot, where oh where can you beeee ..."
I know where to find that soft yummy cushion

Comment by Steve Gann

June 1st 2009 01:27
Good informative column.I was telling some of my pharmacy students how certain drugs like SSRIs can create spontaneous orgasms. My question is if your partner experiences one of these, do you still get the credit for it? I mean it could be a delayed onset thingee.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 03:47
hi Norm,

thats not true, Satan is an OBGYN




hi Raoul,

great trivia . . . i should see if i can track down the YouTube for that one

you sound like you would be popular with the ladies




hi Steve,

SSRI - Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors aka antidepressants eg:Zoloft

im a keen googler

you know, im sure i saw an episode of Law & Order SVU where a college girl was given some kind of recreational drug (perhaps prescription) that was toted as the "love drug" and supposed to raise her libido and/or induce spontaneous orgasm . . . in the show she died of a bad reaction while sitting at a restaurant . . . i cant remember the clinical name for the drug though

i think in that fictional case the person that put it in her drink was given full credit for the orgasm . . . and murder

Comment by Natalina

June 1st 2009 06:01
women with higher emotional intelligence have a greater frequency of orgasm

It's true. Oh god oh God oh GOD!!! It really is true.

Comment by Bryn

June 1st 2009 06:08
Settle down Natalina, you're becoming emotional!

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 06:14
hi Natalina,

its funny, when that study hit the news the headlines largely said "intelligence" rather than "emotional intelligence", even the article i linked to was called "Intelligent women enjoy sex more than 'bimbos', research finds" haha

EQ is pretty different to IQ, one was used to measure the intelligence of Einstein, while the other is the cornerstone of romance quizzes in womens magazines

however, im sure you have a high EQ and a high IQ, you can orgasm all day AND operate the orgasm scanning machine




hi Bryn,

she was just having a spiritual revelation . . .

either that or Vinnie Jones was coming (pardon the pun) at her with a meat cleaver

Comment by the world of gaye

June 1st 2009 06:23
Gee Morgan
It's been a long long time since Iv'e had a biology lesson. But now it's become so technical I think I was better off before I knew

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 06:32
hi Gaye,

it kind of takes all the mystery out of it, doesnt it?

im just fascinated with genetics and evolution, and thought it was quite cute how even biologists cant really explain how women work, theyve got a few bits and pieces, and theyve obviously been trying really hard, but it all comes down to a tits on a man analogy haha

Comment by Lilla

June 1st 2009 06:49
Morgan,

Don*t know about all that science stuff, but I do know they are good fun. . Feel sorry for those of you a sexual people who have never had the experience though, its like having children, certainly life affirming and life changing. . although i guess you wouldn*t miss what you*ve never had, or don*t desire?

The stats are interesting though.

Lilla . .

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 06:53
hi Lilla,

yes thanks for all the sympathy

Comment by Raoul Duke

June 1st 2009 08:08
Excuse me for being a bit slow on the uptake, but Morgan, are you of asexual orientation?? And if so, what exactly does that entail for you? Does that mean you've never had sex? Or that you no longer feel sexual attraction? Sorry if I come across as ignorant, but I had originally assumed you were gay, possibly bisexual, but reading between the lines - ie Lilla's comment and your reply, and noting previous posts you've written, I'm now confused. It's none of my business really, but I'm very curious ...

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 08:22
hi Raoul,

no thats ok, im pretty open about it

yes, im Asexual, i always have been, born that way, ive never met a person i was sexually attracted to in my whole life, im 28 now and i left home when i was 18, i never had any romantic sexual relationships at school and ive only had platonic relationships over the last 10 years

im a great admirer of the human form, esp faces, and particularly in the arts, i find beauty in images, but i am sexually attracted to neither gender

i identify as Queer because Asexual is outside of the hetero-norm, i have a great affinity with gay people and trans people as we all share the grey area

Comment by Lara M

June 1st 2009 08:53
The stats sure are interesting... Never really gave it a deep thought that it could be that technical...

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 09:02
hi Lara,

if there was anyone in the world who could make orgasms nerdy, i am just the woman for the job!

everything is deep here on the Deep Pencil

Comment by Janet Collins

June 1st 2009 12:09
Wealth? That would go against the whole story in Lady Chatterleys Lover wouldn't it?

Comment by Natalina

June 1st 2009 15:08
Whew! Took me a little bit to get back here to defend myself. I spent all night rolling around on the floor looking for hot spots. I was also having trouble accessing the internet, LOL

Now what was I saying?? This is going to be a long coupl of weeks

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 1st 2009 22:33
hi Janet,

well i guess you have the thrill of doing something naughty and getting caught versus the relaxation of stability and security

i guess the super wealthy have all the time in the world to experiment in bed




hi Natalina,

hot spots? haha

i take it we are talking about the internet connection now, because if not i think we have delved into the groan-worthy euphemisms of Mills & Boon novels

now go slip your computer a length of cord . . .

Comment by Lilla

June 2nd 2009 01:49
hahahaha Morgan, sorry but that is just the point I don*t know wether to feel sorry for you or not, sometimes your messages are so contradictory?

I know you cannot miss what you don*t feel and as i said, I went through a period of about seven years of feeling nothing at all sexually myself following a near death experience, so kind of can understand; but it is your posts that confuse me the most as they claim about 99% sexual content, which clearly shows that a great deal of thinking about sex is prevealant somewhere within your psyche? During my years of *No Feeling* I did not think of sex at all.

I mean no disrespect, I am just trying to understand (perhaps as you are)? You must have a million unanswered questions in a world not geared for the *different* amongst us. Don*t I know it. For my own part, and my limited asexual experience, it felt like wanting to travel again after not being able to get on a plane for a seasoned traveller, but too tired to be bothered . . which left a yearning of sorts although not overtly sexual and it is this feeling (or yearning) that I feel from you sometimes, clearly.

For that I don*t envy you, but I was offered hormone therapy during my own years of being switched off, which they claimed yielded good success rates, but remembered being so annoyed at being considered *abnormal* because my body was taking a vacation, I declined. Not to say I didn*t get depressed, because I did, which is interesting because depression is hormonally linked : but perhaps that*s another discussion for another day. .

As I said, the stats here are rather interesting . .

Lilla . .

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 2nd 2009 02:01
hi Lilla,

but it is your posts that confuse me the most as they claim about 99% sexual content

i dont know what you consider to be "sexual content" but a quick glance down the side-column of my recent and popular and spotlight posts and i dont see a single post with "sexual content" . . . are you referring to the handful of info posts i have done on gender and orientation?

Comment by Lilla

June 2nd 2009 02:09
Yes, exactly, like you are trying to make sense of it yourself too.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 2nd 2009 02:19
hi Lilla,

i dont really know what you are trying to say? are you saying i cant be Asexual if i post information on the diversity of the queer community?

Comment by Lilla

June 2nd 2009 03:35
Morgan,

No not at all, you misunderstand me. Perhaps I misworded *Sexual Content?* I meant Sexual Reference, but that is no cause for defensiveness as I am not questioning your right to write about anything you want to, nor to be as you are, or aligned (as you are) to any group you choose to be aligned with.

Not at all, sweetie, I am merely responding to your comment on you *appreciating my sympathy* (or not as the case may be) and the very real fact that you saw it as such and I sometimes hesitate to not feel it for you as your messages seem unclear sometimes. Excuse any ignorance, but as one of the only truly asexual people I have ever (almost) met, I find your preoccupation with sex and your in depth analysis of it, interesting. Particularly because during my own phase of said same condition (although not to say it was the same condition as your own), I did not think or ananlyse sex at all, actually it repulsed me.

As a journalist myself, I guess I am naturally curious and I am sorry if you feel I am prying, but you seem very open about wanting to discuss your condition and I thought you might enlighten those, like myself, curious enough to dig a bit deeper. As I said, I was offered hormone therapy and wondered what the statistics were on curing this *problem,* or if you feel like I did, annoyed at being considered *abnormal* by mainstream society.

I do not doubt for a minute that you would identify with homosexual and bi~curious people in this regard, as I said, I have been to the *too hard basket* myself.

However, Deep Pencil whilst also interesting, clearly shows, that it would not be unfair to surmise that most sexually active people don*t seem as preoccupied with the role of sex in society, as an asexual one and it says something about you as a person. That*s all.

Lilla ..

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 2nd 2009 04:46
hi Lilla,

Asexuality is not a condition or a problem, it is an orientation, if a low sex drive is distressing to you then you are not Asexual, you are suffering from a dysfunction and may wish to seek medical advice, in my case it is not distressing it is just how i was born and it doesnt bother me in any way so i am Asexual

i dont understand your comment that i am "preoccupied" with sex, which posts are you referring to?

this post is not overtly sexual, an orgasm is a bodily function and my article is about how teams of scientists with high tech equipment cannot explain completely why women have them, why it has evolved, a bodily function that not all women experience, and a bodily function that is not biologically necessary - it appears to be completely superfluous, and it appears our species is mid-mutation of either natural selecting or rejecting orgasms for women, its just science, just biology

if you see it as sexual thats because you are a sexual person and project your own preoccupation with sex into it

some people can examine, research, and discuss the human body without confusing it for erotica

i write on science, trivia, humour, entertainment, womens issues, gay rights, and queer theory . . . i dont know how you can misconstrue that as a "preoccupation" with sex or "99% sexual content" or references

i honestly am not seeing what you are seeing

i think you might be confusing sexual behaviour, or displays of sexual desires, with the examination of personal identity and orientation

it is also a mistake to assume Asexual people are anti-sex, that we find it repulsive or seek to avoid hearing about it, or seeing it . . . some Asexuals are married to sexual people and participate in sex regularly for reasons other than sexual attraction . . . and all us live in the real world where the majority of people are sexual and our culture is thoroughly saturated with sex . . . Asexual people are not repressed or frustrated or naive about sex, its not about being chaste or virtuous or modest or delicate, we do not bury our heads in the sand about the reality of the sexual activities of others or the functionality of the human body

if you genuinely want to know more about Asexuality try THIS POST or google AVEN

Comment by Lilla

June 2nd 2009 05:15
Morgan,

I appreciate you taking the time to try and respond and can clearly see that you are too defensive and honestly not able to open a dialogue on the simple question I have asked on whether you have been offered hormone treatment and if you have whether you would take it. ie do asexual people covet to have an orgasm or not, or is that as individual a choice within the asexual community, as sexual preference is within the general community.

I am sorry that you see my questioning as an attack on your asexuality and your right to be a person who is one, it is clearly not my intention and you are way off if you think otherwise. Open discussion helps many readers to relate and heal.

No matter, maybe another day . . and I do really appreciate the links, it would have been nice to get a *real persons* perspective though, instead of all that scientific claptrap.. . as a journalist you would appreciate the need for a voice grab here and there.

Be well.

Lilla

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 2nd 2009 14:16
hi Lilla,

no i have not sought, nor would i take, any medical treatments for my Asexuality as i do not believe it is an illness

Asexual people are physically able to have sex and orgasms they are just not motivated to engage in sexual activities with other people as they do not find them attractive

i dont know what every Asexual person thinks about orgasms as they are all individuals, some dont care, some masturbate, some choose to have sex purely for the physical sensation (much like how situational homosexuality is no reflection of true orientation) . . . im not going to talk about the particulars of my own sex life, past or present, in any detail on a public forum as i personally believe that to be a private matter of no real relevance to this post, my character, my opinions, my profession, or my orientation

maybe you would come across less condescending if you had not just finished telling me Asexuals are unable to know anything about the dating behaviour of men on The Female View

Morgan,

I must say i found your comment strange and perplexing. .

1. because it puports to an intimate knowledge of men; which in my limited knowledge of A sexual preferences, would be impossible for you to have experienced first hand? and;

2. because the naivete of the comment itself proves perhaps that you are inexperienced in this field as one would expect an A sexual to be?

Really Long Link

your skeptical tone indicates you are not really interested in discussion or relating or learning, you are just trying to drive home some point that Asexual people are unqualified to talk about sex or relationships

as an Asexual, and a human being, i disagree


Comment by Lilla

June 2nd 2009 22:11
no i have not sought, nor would i take, any medical treatments for my Asexuality as i do not believe it is an illness

Asexual people are physically able to have sex and orgasms they are just not motivated to engage in sexual activities with other people as they do not find them attractive.
Thank you for answering my question, that is all I wanted to know.

Thank you for answering my question.

I felt exactly the same way at the time myself, (although I see that you don*t see that I had the same condition as you) although it doesn*t speak for all asexuals (of either persuasion) it does clarify it for others reading and also for me too. That it was a phase in my case and not a permanent condition.

As for learning more about your sex life, gosh, what a suggestion . . yuk, I am not voyeuristic and interested I can assure you. You obviously don*t read my posts or know me very well at all. No harm done though and no offence taken, my writing is not for everyone, but your accusation also holds an admission of you having one ~ again the mixed message. Is contradiction perhaps another sign of an asexual disposition?

Morgan, everyone sounds condescending to the overly defensive (and recently attacked), so no apologies on my approach, because like you I am also allowed to be the way I am (albeit, usually misunderstood). I understand that sometimes people in society badger you for being *different.* I would be the first to agree with that. Having said that, I was not badgering and will not bother you again, as your defensiveness is tedious and tiring to those you consider *outsiders.*

As for all that other stuff you mention, copy, paste and reprint and whatever else you do to hold up mirrors : you once again misunderstand me. My point again, for those who do not know honest curiosity when they come across it, was that as an asexual I found it peculiar that you would have such a strong opinion about heterosexual men without comparison of your own heterosexual relationships to compare against?

It is what got me curious about who you are and how you would have said such a thing. Nothing sinister I can assure you.

In my opinion, not one of the 11 or so sexes likes stereotyping Morgan, so I found it a little strange and perplexing that you would place such a harsh label on heterosexual males, which you would abhor and fight so hard against being made against asexual*s or homosexuals, if the shoe was on the other foot. It just wreaked of double standards to me, that*s all and the possibility that asexuals have double standards like mysonginists was intriguing, sorry.

To me it was as rash a statement as saying all asexual people usually end up accepting that they are ill 99.9% of the time. Which we agree is very wrong indeed!

Perhaps you can start to see my confusion, although I doubt it very much as you do not have it in you I think . . .and in fact, the way you twist things about does not suit my straightforward way of thinking at all come to think of it. Talking to you openly is like trying to hold a porcupine. I will revert to google in future as you suggest and put it down to asexual people being difficult.

Shame, because who people are, interests me, not what they know and for the open minded, orble is a wonderful place to stop and chat to the unusual and different among us, and because i though asexual meant self reproducing?

Although I admire you if you verify this comment, I wish I could say it had been nice chatting to you, but the truth is you have made me feel terrible.

Lilla ..

Comment by Raoul Duke

June 3rd 2009 01:09
So, if I can probe a little deeper on one more question ...
As an Asexual, when you masturbate what do you fantasize about??
.... or do you simply abstain?

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 3rd 2009 11:04
hi Lilla,

did it really require an essay long response to explain you have no sense of humour?

maybe you feel terrible because you are acting like a terrible person right now

i have Verified your comments so far, but you are really not adding anything to my blog, so if you dont like me and you dont like my posts there is really no need for you to comment again

there is also no need to address me when i am commenting on my friends blogs, have a bit of common decency and keep your ignorant prejudices to yourself




hi Raoul,

nice try

do many women answer when you ask them questions like that?

Comment by Raoul Duke

June 4th 2009 00:32
I had to ask ... Perhaps you fantasize about crushed blue velvet? One can only speculate ...

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 4th 2009 01:19
hi Raoul,

i like your cheekiness

Comment by Jeff Musall

June 9th 2009 23:00
Hi Morgan, since when does it matter a rat's ass bit (your sexual orientation) as to your ability to write about a topic? I'm not gay, but write about same-sex issues....I'm not religious, and write about that...and (thankfully!) I'm not conservative, and write about that....and have never been questioned...it seems odd that someone was so pre-occupied with why you would pen an article about sexual issues....
As for the article....wealthy men, smealthy men...this working class guy could show 'em a thing or two!

Comment by Kleonaptra

June 10th 2009 00:59
Hey Morgan.

Ive been thinking about this post for sometime, and the reason for the female orgasam is quite obvious and Im surprised that you never stumbled across it.

Biologically it is unclear why women have orgasms.


Now, there is a theory in humans that Kman reminded me of last night, in which the female orgasam and the muscles involved in doing it actually push the sperm closer to the point where the environment is most favourable for conception. But that, I think, is needlessly complicated as a reason, even if it may hold some merit.

Orgasams from the female are for the creation of desire. Desire is paramount for reproduction. All biological organisims are hard wired to reproduce, therefore, a female orgasam, though serving no specific purpose - such as the male ejaculation required to deposit the sperm itself - serves the purpose of 'preparing' the female for future breedings. One breeding may not always lead to conception, and one child is usually not enough for the biological clock to stop ticking. I personally believe, that humans made their way to the top of the food chain (one of the reasons) because female human desire and pleasure in sex is greatly higher than that in other species. It is all tied into desire and an orgasam perpetuates desire. If humans had no desire in their females, we can be smart, great hunters, with all the opposable and prehensile limbs we want, without the ability to populate our territory we would lose out to another species simply through numbers.

Cats are a great example. The male cat has a barbed penis, and when he ejaculates, he actually stabs her with the barbs and this is extremely painful for the female. Its why they howl. The barbs however, cause her to ovulate, without that stimulation she cannot. The pressure of unreleased ovaries is also painful, so for a cat, its a choice between pain and pain.

What if humans worked like that, and cats the opposite? Almost no humans would be born at all, because human females have the smarts to say 'no. Id rather suffer this pressure than the barbs'. We would live in tiny communities, very small amounts of children born per year, no intimacy would develop between families....And we'd be afraid to leave our villages because of all the cats!

Biologists are unable to answer why so many women should be unable to have orgasms during penetrative sex, but able to have them by masturbation

This ones a bit trickier, and personally I believe that as all women are individual, they are thus built differently. Clitoral stimulation (mostly used in masturbation) always works, but thats not surprising, given that the clitoris is the female equivalent of a penis. Penetration in itself does not really stimulate THAT many nerves - nature built us without too many there so that birth was not TOO painful. However, I strongly believe that it has a lot to do with the man involved, how many muscles he can stimulate with his equipment. Finding the man that 'fits' goes a long way towards a penetrative orgasam......I can say (blushing) personally, I never had one of those until I met Kman, even though I knew my own body very well at the time, it seemed part of him knew me even better!

Try a combination of both......And you will throw out the vibrators forever.

This is my personal experience which comes from talking with girlfriends and breeding animals for over ten years now. I have bred all species of birds, horses, cats dogs and more, and no matter how uncomfortable it is for the female, they always returen to season and crave sex. Funnily enough, a difficult BIRTH may put them off breeding, or a particular male may put them off seeing him, personally, but the females will always return to season again and desire the act itself. Why are humans obsessed with sex? Because every biological organisim is, all of life revolves around the creation of life, and living on property and running an eco system, I get to see it first hand.....Even plants seek constantly to perpetuate themselves.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 10th 2009 08:51
hi Jeff,

no i dont think it matters either, i have linked to the sources if anyone wants to check the validity of the research, i dont see how the sexual orientation of the person reporting on the studies has anything to do with eligibility to produce content on the topic

same thing happened when i dared to offer an alternate theory on the Sri Lankan civil war, i was told i was not enough of an "authority" on the topic to present quotations from the people of Sri Lanka

theres a little group of extremely hostile people on this network who take turns coming over to my blog to tell me i have no right to post . . . it really upsets them that i am here at all

well boo hoo to those cry babies

as Manson would say "I wasn't born with enough middle fingers"





hi Kleo,

you present some very interesting theories, thanks for taking the time to consider the issue so thoroughly

in your experience do all female animals seek out sex with males during breeding season?

i would have thought with any mammals, including humans, that one of the major biological factors aiding reproduction is the male being physically larger and stronger than the female to facilitate "rape" where the females desires are not essential . . . just speculating, im not an animal expert

but even in humans a strong heterosexual attraction in the female is not particularly necessary to produce offspring

also i think there are many other species (im thinking along the lines of rabbits and mice and even insects) who breed at a much more rapid rate than humans, i think theres just more of us because we live longer naturally and have extended our life expectancy with medicine and technology

even given the average non-desexed female cat and the average pre-contraception female human, over their lifespans, or even over a set period of time, im sure the cat would produce more offspring than the human . . . well i think anyway . . . i wonder how the gestational periods, fertile years, death in childbirth, infant mortality, and multiple births would factor in to a comparison?

i like this:

female orgasam and the muscles involved in doing it actually push the sperm closer to the point where the environment is most favourable for conception

i wonder if it has ever been scientifically proven?

all very interesting, thanks for the discussion

Comment by Kleonaptra

June 10th 2009 23:48
in your experience do all female animals seek out sex with males during breeding season?

You've done it now Morgan.

You got me started.

It is my personal opinion (and I stress that very hard) that all animals are bisexual. I use the term bisexual because that term always has meant to me the same as 'trisexual' or in laymans terms - DO IT WITH ANYTHING

IF a male of the species is within scent range they seek him out. Our boy cats are only half boys, had a vasectomy but still capable of ejaculation. Female ferals come to the door and call for them. Male ferals also come and call to the females even though ours are desexed! I was astounded to find, when a mare moves into our 'territory' they instantly focus on Zayfir, my stallion, and begin to flirt. They seem to come in season just by him being there. They call, flirt and whisk their tail. It makes my life hell.

If no male is available in scent range they turn to others seemingly out of frustration - My mums girl dogs have been doing it for years, my mare once let herself be bred by other mares. Birds are literal sluts, and can cross species - with successful conception - with ease.

However, I believe my show gelding Magnus, to be gay. As a colt, he was angry and frustrated and had no interest in girls. Once we chopped the nuts, he became sweet and gentle but the way he moves, rests a back foot, and enjoys putting on makeup to go to show, throws tantrums if his hooves arent right - its all very Queenlike. He doesnt like most straight men (unless they suck up to him) adores gay men and romances women. He adores having his temperature taken.....Yep....Up the butt.....And snuggles with the colt and backs up for him. However, if the colt ever mounts him, Magnus crosses his legs and says angrily he's not that kind of boy.

The colt is assuredly after every female in sight, but snuggles up to Magnus as if pretending he's female. He hasnt mounted him in a while, but Im sure he would if he thought he could do it without injury and he'd stick it wherever he could fit it. He's a teenage boy.

My mynah bird and pigeon hump my hand. That seems to do the trick for them!

So, yes, females do seek out the males, but are happy to release the pressure in other ways. Once, my desexed female and vasectomied male cat rolled around together....Neither was 'on season' and neither knew how to mount and mate. But they rolled around like a cat porno and I just moaned in disbelief 'my god. What have we done to animals!'

'Rape' in the truest sense of the word, meaning, 'NO CONSENT' is only prevalent in humans. They call it rape in the animal world if multiple males seek the same female, such as in dolphins or sparrows - Ive seen poor girl sparrows raped up to ten times. But, these females are IN SEASON and in that sense, they have given their consent. Being in season, they have sought out the males, and when more males come than they expected, they try to get out of it, but for some species it really is just the natural order. It widens the gene pool and creates a greater amount of offspring - humans dont have that excuse, especially when the majority of us still claim that pheremones have no effect!


im sure the cat would produce more offspring than the human . .

For these two paragraphs I clarify my point - that if humans had to breed the way cats do, and other animals had no such barries to their reproduction, then it would definitely slow us down enough to let another species jump to the top. I suppose I meant to say that somewhere along the evolution chain we made a good decision in the way of breeding and reproduction, and if we had made a bad one, we wouldnt be here now.

Really, we did make a bad decision, and now the fabric is beginning to degrade. Within the next hundred years we will no longer be at the top of the food chain. We stopped adapting a long time ago.

Kman did in fact read it in some science magazine Im sure - but probably an old one. He reads all kinds of nerdy stuff. Really, whats more true, is that if male and female both orgasam and stay LOCKED TOGETHER and fall asleep, pregnancy is pretty much garunteed. The muscles might help push it up there, who knows? But its the locked together for a few hours part that really matters.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 12th 2009 13:11
hi Kleo,

haha no thats ok, i like hearing about your observations and theories, thanks for sharing

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 12th 2010 03:19
Hallo! I really liked your posts Kleonaptra XD
I'm a biology major and I looove hearing new things. Your posts seem very logical.

Raoul - LOL you sound like such a horndog!

Miss(or Mrs.?)Bell - I enjoyed the original post very much.
But that argument between you and lilla wuuuuz very long. Ugh, some people just don't know when to stop. She really DIDN'T have to write an essay, lol. Especially, because I just cannot help myself, I'm so nosy I had to read it all!

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 13th 2010 01:05
Lillie,
bow-wow-wow-yippy-yo-yippy-ya y!

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 13th 2010 01:45
XD

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 13th 2010 02:18
What exactly is "XD" Lillie? Is that a crosseyed face with a huge tongue poking out?

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 13th 2010 03:52
lol no. Its that smile that's so intense your eyes squint up so much they are closed, and your cheeks feel like they're on fire from the muscle workout your gettin. So it's just a really cheesy smile (unless you're asian, then it's normal).

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 13th 2010 04:06
Really cheesy smile huh?
And is that normal for you?
Or did you simply find my doggystyle funny?

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 13th 2010 04:08
wow.

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 13th 2010 07:28
Hmmmm, methinks you've taken offense, when none was intended. Tone gets lost in text, and I wasn't sure if you were indicating you were Asian (which I see you're not), as well as trying to make a tongue-in-cheek reference ... Sounds like I failed miserably by the "tone" of your "wow".

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 13th 2010 14:23
lol you said methinks. That's funny. No I didn't take offense, I was smiling when I wrote it. Believe you me, I've said things much more indecent than doggystyle. I hang out with dudes, I'm a dudette.

Guess I could have put an lol after the wow.
How do you know I wasn't referencing World Of Warcraft? ;p (WOW)

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 13th 2010 23:12
... and here I was misunderstandin a simple "wow", thinking you were interpreting my comment as sexist in some way. Oh, the irony!
So what is your heritage then? Are you of Pacific Island descent? Kiwi? It's hard to tell for sure from the thumbnail ... lol

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 14th 2010 00:01
My mother is white, my father is black. So I'm just mixed. I get questions like that all the time.

Mexican? Philipino? Hawaiian? Indian? People don't even know what women from those places look like, they just make crazy guesses because I'm not white or black!

You obviously have more than amateur knowledge of the darker berries...

LOL saw your blog. (you are DEFINATELY not the horndog I thought you were....o.0?-that's sarcasm)

I even have on many occasion had people come up to me speaking different languages, and alas, I know little or none of what they say. I think it's funny.

Lol, pacific island descent.... Always fun to say "Nope, just black 'n white."

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 14th 2010 01:49
But your roundabout answer then makes me ask: What blood is your papa? African? Just curious 'tis all.

(and as for my more than amateur knowledge, I know this much: the darker the berry ... )

"Why must I be like that? Why must I chase the cat? Must be the dawg in me, must be the dawg in me ..."

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 14th 2010 06:55
I dunno his blood lol. He is dark enough to seem like his ancesters could have come from africa... He says he has cherokee in him, which totally seems like a lie to me, cause he's sooo black.

His facial strucure does not scream of africa. And he's from the states.

My mom says she has lots of irish, but she has straight black hair... maybe the irish is recessive in her.

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 14th 2010 07:33
Sounds like you're a throwback like me

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 14th 2010 08:09
lol. throwback. haven't heard that in a while.

Comment by Morgan Bell

September 14th 2010 08:35
Hi Lillie Dell,

Sorry I did not respond earlier, I've had a little blogging absence lately.

I am a Ms.

I am glad Raoul has been keeping you occupied while I was away. I think horndog is an adequate description.

Thanks for bringing me back to this post, I was thoroughly entertained reading over the old flame war - it always spills over into the most unlikely of topics.

Great to meet you. Do you have a blog on Orble?

Comment by Lillie Dell

September 14th 2010 13:42
Hello, I just made an account. Haven't blogged anything though. I think I can spare some rants. lol

Comment by Raoul Duke

September 14th 2010 22:40
Rant away ... I'll try and be a good puppy.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
334 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Morgan Bell's Blogs

5658 Vote(s)
88 Comment(s)
62 Post(s)
12905 Vote(s)
839 Comment(s)
94 Post(s)
Moderated by Morgan Bell
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]