YouTube Atheists pack a punch
June 16th 2009 14:16
There is a really active and vibrant Atheist community on YouTube.
Here are my TOP FIVE favourite Atheist videos from YouTube. Some are pure comedy, some are philosophical, many contain interesting facts, and all of the users who created them are complete characters.
If you enjoy the videos be sure to check out their other work, there is a virtual goldmine available if you are curious to learn more about science, history, and politics as it relates to the non-believer.
Laci Green gogreen18
TJ TheAmazingAtheist
Richard The Dick coughlan666
Thunderf00t
Thunderf00t has created a 30 part series debunking Creationists
CLICKHERE for the "Why Do People Laugh At Creationists" playlist
Desertphile
GRAVITY!
Here are my TOP FIVE favourite Atheist videos from YouTube. Some are pure comedy, some are philosophical, many contain interesting facts, and all of the users who created them are complete characters.
If you enjoy the videos be sure to check out their other work, there is a virtual goldmine available if you are curious to learn more about science, history, and politics as it relates to the non-believer.
Laci Green gogreen18
TJ TheAmazingAtheist
Richard The Dick coughlan666
Thunderf00t
Thunderf00t has created a 30 part series debunking Creationists
CLICKHERE for the "Why Do People Laugh At Creationists" playlist
Desertphile
GRAVITY!
| 99 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog

























Comment by Mau-Medellin
Mau-Medellin
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
relevant as always . . .
Comment by RubySoho
Music Zone
Thought Zone
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
maybe shes including it because the victims of the holocaust were selected based on their religion?
Hitler did rise to power on a platform of ridding Germany of Jewish people, i know many people believe the rise of Hitler and the Holocaust were approved by the Catholic church, and supported by Catholic people
also i find American Atheists anticipate certain well-worn arguments, such as the common erroneous assertion that Hitler was an Atheist, i dare say Laci was over-compensating by placing sole blame in the opposite direction
Comment by Ruby not logged in
I learned this when I was studying to become a Jehovah's Witness. We were told to be proud and in awe of those whose faith was so strong they would suffer imprisonment, torture and almost certain death rather than even pretend to give up their religion. Apparently, that would have hurt God's feelings.
So off to the gas chambers they went, without so much a taxi or a loaf of bread.
Would no religion have meant no Holocaust? I doubt it. I think Hitler would have found some other scapegoat. That;'s what I mean about it not been inspired by or committed in the name of religion.
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
yeah i agree, being Jewish is an ethnicity
thats really interesting about the other religions, sounds a bit like the witch hunts in the film The Crucible
funny!
i wonder what went wrong? when they asked god what they should do was there some kind of communication breakdown, or did he not answer at all? because surely if they asked him and obeyed him god would have rewarded them . . . surely
Comment by The wonderful Peter Yang
The First Wonderful Peter Yang's Variety Blog
The New Wonderful Peter Yang's variety blog
Power Ranger Online
TV Online
Stay healthy and loose weight
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
i like your new Bill Clinton avatar!
there is some really interesting content on YouTube, i can spend hours watching videos, so much great info
thanks for the comment
Comment by Ruby not logged in
Religion has a lot to answer for.
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
i just got the funniest anonymous comment from David )i presume) saying, amongst other things:
i think he needs to watch Laci Greens video
Comment by Lord Anthony
Hi Morgan, can you support this statement, or was it just a cheap swipe at the Church? I would love to see you try to sustain that argument.
Lord Anthony
Comment by Anthony Smith
Control Order
Can you support that argument? Can you show me that the Catholic Church supported Hitler's attempt to exterminate European Jewry? Or were you just airing a common slander without the ability to support it?
_Lord Anthony
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
Reichskonkordat, otherwise known as Hitler's Concordat with the Catholic Church (1933), is one of the main reasons many people believe the Catholic Church aided and approved of Hitler and the Holocaust
CLICKHERE for the history on Wiki and CLICKHERE for an outline of the Acts which made up the Treaty prepared by John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York
excerpts from wiki:
After the initialing of the treaty on 14 July, the Cabinet minutes record Hitler as saying that the concordat had created an atmosphere of confidence that would be "especially significant in the struggle against international Jewry." In essence, he was claiming that the Catholic Church had publicly given its blessing, at home and abroad, to the policies of National Socialism, including its anti-Semitic stand.
Most historians consider the Reichskonkordat an important step toward the international acceptance of Adolf Hitler's Nazi regime. Guenter Lewy, political scientist and author of The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany, wrote:
"There is general agreement that the Concordat increased substantially the prestige of Hitler's regime around the world. As Cardinal Faulhaber put it in a sermon delivered in 1937:
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
(click on image to enlarge)
“The historical consensus is that Pius XII abided by and enabled the murder of millions of Jews at the hands of the Nazi machine. After the concordat was signed with Hitler on July 14, 1933, the Nazi Cabinet minutes of the meeting verify that Hitler said the agreement advanced an atmosphere of confidence which would be ‘especially significant in the struggle against international Jewry.’ Hitler could not have hoped for a more unequivocal endorsement and blessing for the Final Solution,”
Dov Hikind - Democratic New York State Assemblyman and Orthodox Jew
Really Long Link
"After the Reich Concordat was signed, Pacelli declared it an unparalleled triumph for the Holy See. In an article in L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican-controlled newspaper, he announced that the treaty indicated the total recognition and acceptance of the church's law by the German state. But Hitler was the true victor and the Jews were the concordat's first victims. On July 14, 1933, after the initialing of the treaty, the Cabinet minutes record Hitler as saying that the concordat had created an atmosphere of confidence that would be "especially significant in the struggle against international Jewry." He was claiming that the Catholic Church had publicly given its blessing, at home and abroad, to the policies of National Socialism, including its anti-Semitic stand. At the same time, under the terms of the concordat, Catholic criticism of acts deemed political by the Nazis, could now be regarded as "foreign interference." The great German Catholic Church, at the insistence of Rome, fell silent. In the future all complaints against the Nazis would be channeled through Pacelli.
...
[regarding the 1938 encyclical titled "Humani Generis Unitas (The Unity of the Human Race)"]. For all its good intentions and its repudiation of violent anti-Semitism, the document is replete with the anti-Jewishness that Pacelli had displayed in his early period in Germany. The Jews, the text claims, were responsible for their own fate. God had chosen them to make way for Christ's redemption, but they denied and killed him. And now, "blinded by their dream of worldly gain and material success," they deserved the "worldly and spiritual ruin" that they had brought down upon themselves."
Hitler's Pope by John Cornwell, first published in Vanity Fair (1999), later the same year published as a very controversial book of the same name
Comment by samaritan
Fringe Faith
Samaritan's Stories
Hitler's Pope would not be considered a very fair and balanced account. Wikipedia has this to say about it:
I do think that are more balanced accounts of Pius XII that come to the conclusion that he should have done more. However, there are also books that defend him, saying he did all that he could and actually helped to save many Jews. The point is there is not agreement on this issue.
Samaritan
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
what Cornwell has said, and what he was criticised for, was not taking into account the full scope of extenuating circumstances that contributed to the Popes motivatation for his decisions
the facts however are not in dispute, the quotes and general history are accurate
Don Hikind said there is "historical consensus" and Guenter Lewy said "most historians" agree, and i said "many people believe", which is true, many people do
and what do they believe? that regardless of personal motivation, the actions of the Vatican in signing a pact with Hitler enabled the Nazi regime by substantially increased their international reputation and preventing German Catholic people from protesting
the Church also aided by helping identify people of Jewish ancestry with their private records
were the Vatican anti-Semitic? did they just not care? were they busy looking after their own? or were their hands truly forced? people can make their own judgement based on the evidence
the question Ruby asked was why does Laci Green (top video) consider the Holocaust to be a religiously inspired atrocity, my explanation:
maybe shes including it because the victims of the holocaust were selected based on their religion?
Hitler did rise to power on a platform of ridding Germany of Jewish people, i know many people believe the rise of Hitler and the Holocaust were approved by the Catholic church, and supported by Catholic people
also i find American Atheists anticipate certain well-worn arguments, such as the common erroneous assertion that Hitler was an Atheist, i dare say Laci was over-compensating by placing sole blame in the opposite direction
thats the context of my comments, and i stand by them
Comment by RubySoho
Music Zone
Thought Zone
The Vatican has apologised to Jews on behalf of the entire Roman Catholic community, for failing to speak out against the Nazi holocaust during World War Two.
The Vatican's long-anticipated response to the killing of six million Jews was published in Rome on Monday.
The Head of the Vatican Commission, Cardinal Edward Cassidy, said the Vatican's statement amounted to an act of repentance as well as an apology.
The document asks whether persecution was made easier because some Christians held anti-Jewish prejudices.
But it also declares that many people were unaware of Hitler's so-called "final solution".
Pope John Paul has said he hopes the apology will help to heal the wounds of past injustices and misunderstandings between Christians and Jews.
But the document makes no criticism of the Pope of the time, Pius XII, who has been accused by the Jews of pro-German tendencies.
The Vatican mentions that Pius XII saved hundreds of thousands of Jewish lives himself or through his representatives.
But the document fails to explain why Pope Pius never took sides during World War Two by speaking out against the holocaust while it was actually taking place.
The Vatican has always maintained he did everything he could behind the scenes to stop the slaughter.
The US Jewish community voiced disappointment at the Vatican's statement .
"We are very sad, very disappointed," said Rabbi Leon Klenicki, director of the Department of Interfaith Affairs of the Anti Defamation League.
"The document falls short of the mark, it's taking a step backward," Rabbi Klenicki said.
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) issued a terse statement saying "those of us engaged in the dialogue have not yet succeeded."
Catholic Bishops in France, Germany and Poland admitted they were at fault for their failure to react to Jewish persecution half a century ago.
But it was not until 1965 that the Vatican eliminated the phrase "perfidious Jews" from the liturgy of a Holy Week service.
Emphasis mine. Please note that Morgan did not hereslf say that the Vatican was complicit in the Holocaust, only that many people believe Hitler's treatment of the Jews was tacitly approved by the Church. Whether this is the case is up for debate. But Morgan is correct in saying that there is such a debate. But simply talking about it does not make one an anti-Catholic bigot. There is nothing wrong with criticising the Church. No single person or instiution should be immune from scrutiny or criticism. We all know what happens when they are.
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
thanks for that info
i found the last couple of lines quite interesting
But it was not until 1965 that the Vatican eliminated the phrase "perfidious Jews" from the liturgy of a Holy Week service.
per·fi·dy
noun
1 : the quality or state of being faithless or disloyal : treachery
2 : an act or an instance of disloyalty
it seems many Catholic people can acknowledge the wrongs of the past, which is good because accountability is important
i would also like to note that Reichskonkordat is still valid today in Germany
yes i completely agree with your assessment there
thanks for inserting a rational voice back into this discussion
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
a human god is a bit of an oxymoron, atheists do not believe humans are gods
also, given its age and the combined knowledge and awareness of the people who wrote it, i doubt the bible will ever be proved correct on anything
if by "intellectual" you mean rational, a theist will never be able to achieve that label, esp someone who believes the bible literally, it is the very essence of being irrational
Comment by RubySoho
Music Zone
Thought Zone
"go outside on a friday night. look at all the people drinking and shouting and generally being idiots and then think: the bible was written at a time when people were dumber than we are now.
Classic
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
its so true though
imagine how ignorant the average person was 2000 years ago, with regards to medicine, sanitation, astronomy, physics etc
yeah im going to rely on a book written by those people to start basing my morals and facts on
Comment by RubySoho
Music Zone
Thought Zone
I think there is a lesson in that for all of us.
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
haha well i know i learned something . . .
righteous